How will we make decisions from the start?

[Duncan Rickelton]

1. Shall we try to vote or just discuss and try to reach a general consensus?

2. Shall we wait for a certain number of members before we make any decisions?

3. Shall we just not bother answering this question and see how things work out? We might end up going around in circles here...

Any other possibilities?

[Fred Blomson]

We United Humans, (UHU instead of UNO)
I love the way Duncan put questions and I congratulate him for all he do for the humanity. From the questions I understand that we have much common concerning our way of thinking about e-democracy and all the subjects around it.
The site, the questions and everything belongs to all united humans, that is why we have first to agree which questions shall have the highest priority to be answered first.
Once upon the time the old Greeks developed a high culture and with advanced discussions came to the result direct democracy and nomocracy concerning governing on all the levels. Since then no other better proposal is known concerning this matter.
Since we have no other better proposal it is logic to first of all accept edemocracy and nomocracy.
Unfortunately many humans today continue to support representative democracy and the dominating reason is to preserve the privileges. Many have ideological reasons too. Concerning nomocracy, MS in Word for Windows ignore the word “nomocracy”, this is a shame. At the same time a search on “nomocracy” in Google gives more than 5000 sites…
My proposed question is? Is direct democracy and nomocracy the best governing in all the levels? Do you agree with this question? Have you any alternative question?
I have no answer why not the right questions are coming up and why the united humans are for the most silent.
I know that we must agree about something that unite us all united humans.
Fred Blomson
[e-mail]
www.groups.google.com/group/nomocracy
www.facebook.com/fredblomson, group: e Nomocracy